But we do. The thing is that many times what you call "misandrist" is calling out sexist things that some men think are "manly". Like getting a woman drunk, raping her and claiming that that is not rape and that she just "change her mind" and now is lying. That is considered "being a champion" by some men, so when that people say that it is an awful thing to do to someone, they claim it is an "attack on all men" or "#notallmen". The truth is that men can also become too drunk or have their drink spilled. They can also be rapped. And by claiming that those things are "what men do" and OK, the men who are rapped feel even more ashamed to tell it and to report it to the police. They don't want to be seen as "weak" or "feminine" and in turns make them more vulnerable. So, in fact, the people who complains about "misandry" on those case are attacking men (or some of them) while the women accused of "misandry" are, in fact, defending men.

It is a matter of perspective. Misandry is not the norm, but antiabuse is starting to be more common. And people have learnt the tolerance of the intolerance paradox so they are starting to be less tolerant of the intolerant. So if you really, really want less misandry, you might want start by having a better image of men an ditch things like "boys would be boys" and not limit their opportunities by denying them the option to learn about feelings or domestic skills. Just saying.