It proves my argument that it is about money. If Gina have bringed more people that the one they were losing because her, they wouldn't have fired her. It is a very basic business logic.

Your absurd accusation that I would support Bree firing just proves that you lack basic reading comprehension. Bree brings more public that the people who dislike, he stays. Same with Prat. See? Three examples all point in the same direction. That is how data and logic works.

Now, free speech doesn't include free of consequences. Example: Spoilers. You are free to use your freedom of speech to make spoilers. In Disney that means you'll be fired unless you are a irreplaceable (Tom Holland). It is a breach of contract.

Gina wasn't fired for using her free speech, she was fired for using disney platform to promote her political ideas in a way that hurt Disney's business. And for being bad at her job that involves public relationships, promoting disney brand instead of hurting it and selling merchandise instead of making them lose contracts. She failed. Intentionally, which is worse.

And by the way, you support that Disney have loses so Gina keep publicly offending their viewers which would mean that hundreds of anonymous workers would be fired and lose their jobs when the franchise she is in failed because of her. Very rational and mature.

Words and actions have consequences. Both good and bad. You might wish Gina won't face consequences, but that is not how free speech works.