No, it is a false equivalency because people (0-5 years old are) aren't using her body to live. They breath on their own and can be feed by anyone.

On the other hand, there is an equivalency that anti women always miss, some of those babies need blood and marrow donation. If "life is more important than body integrity", then men should be forced to donate blood and marrow on those situations. Yet, the law says the opposite, than men have a right to refuse donation and let the baby die. Explain why aren't you campaigning for forced blood and marrow donation, please.

If your answer is in the lines of "it is not their responsibility because they didn't have sex", then you are making obvius that what you want is to punish women for having sex, not save lives.

By the way, you can get rid of a 0-5 years old who impedes your career, it is called "giving it for adoption". Or letting the father take care of it, since men can be the ones sacrificing their careers and it would kind of fair. That way all those anti abortion men can show us their commitment to babies.

On the other hand, getting rid of an embrio of phoetus is taking it outside the womb. Since anti-abortion people claim that they are independent, whatever happens after they are removed from the womb we could give the phoetus for adoption, whatever happens after that is "up to god" since it is not a false equivalency acording you. Right?

--> This is called reduction to absurd, by the way.