Read what you just write. A child in need of a blood or marrow donation might die (remember, acording you it was about saving lives), so the reason for the child needing a tranfusion is irrelevant. The result is: if there is no donation, it dies. If there is a donation, survives. If it was about saving children, why not make donations mandatory. You'll save lives!

But you answer right there: a woman engaged in sex! so it was about woman having sex and needing to be punished for it. It is there, in your own words: what matter for you is not the children's lives, is the women who have sex.

So why exactly unborn "child" should have more rights that born babies that everyone agree that are babies? You disdain for children lives (and grannies) is disgusting shows.

Interestingly enough, for you it is wrong to forcibly strap people down and drain them of their blood, but if you read about pregnancy and birth, it is way more draining and painful. For example, many pregnancies require a C-section. That is, cutting a woman down and letting her bleed. And have the embrio and the phoetus feed directly from her. Your double standards show.