Rich priviledge is a good one, but not the "trump card" you think it is. Rich girls and women are raped and killed from time. Many times by men they know.

Well educated upper middle class girls and women get abused, raped, beaten and murdered by their partners with more or less the same frequency than poor women. So having money is not a protection from that. Example: Rianna is rich, Rianna was beaten by her boyfriend. She had black eyes that probably derailed her work where being in pictures is part of the agenda. He got away with it. Being rich didn't protect her. Another example: all the actresses raped by Weinstein. They are rich, that didn't save them.

Toil an underpaid job sucks, but being abused at home also sucks. Being beaten or raped sucks. And I'm not going to start with what is worse, just say that there is a lot that you don't see in the picture you have of those girls and women's lives.

If it is any relief, I think that we should value more the manual jobs. I did some of those when I was younger and I think it was good for me. It taught me many things. But sadly, economic priviledge is not enough to "get rid" of the other problems you might experience.

For example: if tomorrow you win the lotery, you theoretically won't face economic problems, but in practice, you would still face many "class" discriminations associated with your upbringing. It is unfair, but it is what it is. And trying to fit, would only make things worse.

Both my parent worked in what they could. My mother was heavily critiziced for working outside the home. My father was critiziced for "letting my mother work". Yes, that was a thing. But since they had two incomes, they economic situation improved way more than their neighbours. They moved to a better place and while some people was nice, others looked at them as if they were "lesser". My point is, at the same economic level, my mother faced more challenges and were critiziced for being successful while my father was praised for his job success but criticized for not taking away my mom's freedom.

I did benefit from seeing both sides of the coin. But no matter how the economic situation improved for my family, some limitations still stood in my way just for being a girl/woman. Risk of rape, murder and abuse is one of those things. While supposedly "rich neighbourhoods" are "safer", that doesn't apply to rape, going out at night, who you can trust, etc. And yes, you could ask for the computer course and instead be assigned to "art" because "girl".

Considering that I work in IT now, well, let's say that the only use I have for art is to entertain my nephew. On the other hand, things I learned by being a waitress or work part time at odd jobs have come in handy at my IT job, so don't devalue what you do. Here (Europe) trade jobs can be well paid if you set your own bussiness and one guy from my highschool class just did that. He is doing better than a few engineers on our class. He was a bad student, but that doesn't stop him. Well for him.

My point is, you do have some edges/priviledges that you can use. By focusing on what you have bad, you might not be taking advantage of those edges. That was what I learned from my parents who started being poor. Note: here in Spain university was public and subsidized, so they got to study while working. That is something that Europe have and might make a difference. For whatever reason, in USA public services like health and education are not popular and people tend to vote against it.

So that is a different kind of priviledge, being in a country where having cancer won't ruin your economy.

Rich people have it "easier" but not on everything. Same with being a man: you have advantage, but you still have to work hard.